Looks Like Trump's Consumer Product Safety Commission Nominee Is Toast

WASHINGTON ― It appears to be like like President Donald Trump’s nominee to steer the Client Product Security Fee, Nancy Beck, isn’t going wherever.

It’s simply math. Beck’s nomination doesn’t seem to have the votes to clear the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation. Sen. Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.), a committee member, introduced her opposition earlier this month, which might put the vote rely at a 13-13 tie if each different Republican voted sure and each Democrat voted no. A tie means Beck virtually definitely doesn’t advance.

There’s no cause to imagine any Democrat on the committee would vote sure, given the sturdy objections to Beck’s nomination by nearly every environmental and consumer advocacy group you can think of

HuffPost reached out to all 12 Democrats on the panel. Some responded; some didn’t. Most have already publicly introduced their opposition.

All instructed, 10 say they’d oppose Beck: Sens. Maria Cantwell (Wash.), Richard Blumenthal (Conn.), Gary Peters (Mich.), Ed Markey (Mass.), Jacky Rosen (Nev.), Jon Tester (Mont.), Brian Schatz (Hawaii), Tammy Duckworth (In poor health.), Tom Udall (N.M.) and Tammy Baldwin (Wis.). Two haven’t publicly stated: Sens. Amy Klobuchar (Minn.) and Kyrsten Sinema (Ariz.).

There’s even an opportunity the committee received’t trouble to vote on Beck’s nomination.

Beck, a former chemical trade lobbyist named to a high-level put up on the Environmental Safety Company underneath Trump, has been rewriting chemical security guidelines to make them much less protecting of customers and extra pleasant to companies.

She’s drawn specific criticism over her file on perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS, a category of poisonous chemical substances discovered in lots of shopper merchandise and in firefighting foam used at army bases. They’re linked to numerous cancers and different illnesses, decreased fertility and start defects. In keeping with paperwork obtained and released by Sen. Tom Carper (D-Del.), Beck was the driving force behind a White Home effort to weaken a remaining EPA rule on PFAS. She even requested the company to create a particular loophole for importers of PFAS-tainted merchandise.

That’s why Capito is opposing her.

“Dr. Nancy Beck’s file because it pertains to PFAS chemical substances, in addition to her responses to my questions and the questions of different Senators at yesterday’s Commerce Committee listening to have led me to conclude that she will not be the correct individual to steer the Client Product Security Fee,” Capito stated in a June 17 assertion. “The CPSC chairman ought to be somebody who applies the right stability between defending public well being and the surroundings and the wants of our economic system. I’ll vote in opposition to Dr. Beck’s affirmation in each the Commerce Committee and on the Senate ground.”

There’s an opportunity that one other Republican or two on the committee, particularly these in tight reelection campaigns (like Colorado Sen. Cory Gardner), would vote no, too.

A Gardner spokesman didn’t reply to a request for remark.

A spokeswoman for Sen. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.), the chairman of the commerce committee, wouldn’t say when or if he’ll schedule a vote on Beck. She stated committee members are at the moment submitting follow-up inquiries to Beck and others who just lately testified earlier than the panel, which might add weeks to the proceedings. Nominees aren’t thought of for a committee vote till this course of is over, stated the spokeswoman.

If Beck doesn’t have the votes to advance, it’s potential the chairman might take the bizarre route of reporting her nomination to the complete Senate “unfavorably” or with none advice. Nevertheless it’s way more frequent for a committee to easily take no motion on a nomination when the votes aren’t there.

Not less than one different Republican senator who isn’t on the committee is already against Beck, too: Susan Collins of Maine.

“Primarily based on her file on the Environmental Safety Company and on the White Home, I don’t imagine that Dr. Nancy Beck’s views on chemical security, together with on PFAS substances and asbestos, align with the Client Merchandise Security Fee’s mission,” Collins stated in a press release. “I plan to oppose her nomination to steer the CPSC.”

Source link
#Trumps #Client #Product #Security #Fee #Nominee #Toast

Tags : Commissionconsumerelection2020Nancy BecknewsNomineepoliticsProductSafetyScience and TransportationSenateshelley moore capitoToastTrumpsU.S. Consumer Product Safety CommissionUnited States Senate Committee on Commerceusausaelectionuselection

    Leave a Response